Image lag occurs in video recorded or displayed using certain types of pick-up devices and cameras, including the Vidicon picture tube, among others. This type of camera tube captures light radiating from a scene through a lens and projects it onto a photoconductive target, creating a charge-density pattern which is scanned using low-velocity electrons. The resulting image can be amplified and recorded to tape or output to a video monitor. The electrical charge remains present on the target until it is re-scanned or the charge dissipates.
The time delay in establishing a new signal current in the camera to follow the rapid changes in the target illumination is called 'image lag' or simply 'lag'. In the photoconductive camera tubes this occurs in two forms: (i) photoconductive lag determined by the properties of the target materials, and (ii) capacitive lag or beam lag attributed to the storage effect of the pixel capacitance and the beam resistance. The image lag causes smear or comet tails following fast-moving objects in the scene, and the prolonged exposure of a bright stationary object results in a slow decaying after image of x-ray type appearance. This long-term but faint after-image is called burn-in or picture sticking.1
In instances where comet tails or luma trails are visible, the visual artifact is sometimes referred to as “ghost” or “ghosting.” Ghost also refers to an artifact of video transmission when there is a difference in primary and secondary radio frequency signals.
Can it be fixed?
Image lag is not a fixable artifact, but rather a result of the inherent limits of vintage picture tube technology.
Comet Tails are visible when the camera shifts, and a white aura appears around the head of the singer as he moves. (Walter Steding Concerts 1980s, XFR STN Project; Internet Archive, 2013).
1. A. M. Drake, “4.5 Vidicon” in Television and Video Engineering (McGraw Hill Education, 2013), 61. ↩